Skip to main content
Log in

A homotopy perturbation analysis of nonlinear free vibration of Timoshenko microbeams

  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper uses He’s Homotopy Perturbation Method (HPM) to analyze the nonlinear free vibrational behavior of clamped-clamped and clamped-free microbeams considering the effects of rotary inertia and shear deformation. Galerkin’s projection method is used to reduce the governing nonlinear partial differential equation. to a nonlinear ordinary differential equation. HPM is used to find analytic expressions for nonlinear natural frequencies of the pre-stretched microbeam. A parametric study investigated the effects of design parameters such as applied axial loads and slenderness ratio. The effect of rotary inertia and shear deformation on the nonlinear natural frequency was investigated. For verification, a numerical approach was implemented to solve the nonlinear equation. of vibration. A comparison between analytical and numerical results shows that HPM can predict system nonlinear vibrational behavior significantly more accurately than previously used methods in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Benamar, Nonlinear dynamic behavior of fully clamped beams and rectangular isotropic and laminated plates, PhD Thesis, University of Southampton (1990).

  2. A. H. Nayfeh and D. T. Mook, Nonlinear Oscillations, Wiley, New York (1979).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. I. H. Shames and C. L. Dym, Energy and Finite Element Methods in Structural Mechanics, McGraw-Hill, New York (1985).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. T. Pirbodaghi, M. T. Ahmadian and M. Fesanghary, On the homotopy analysis method for non-linear vibration of beams, Mechanics Research Communications, 35(2) (2009) 143–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. S.R.R. Pillai and B.N. Rao, On nonlinear free vibrations of simply supported uniform beams, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 159(3) (1992) 527–531.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. X. M. H. Huang, C. A. Zorman, M. Mehregany and M. L. Roukes, Nanodevice Motion at Microwave Frequencies, Nature (London) 421 (2003) 496–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. H. G. Craighead, Nanoelectromechanical systems, Science, 290 (2000) 1532–1535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D. V. Scheible, A. Erbe and R. H. Blick, Evidence of a Nanomechanical Resonator Being Driven into Chaotic Response via the Ruelle-Takens Route, Appl. Phys. Lett., 81 (2002) 1884–1886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. H. Zhong and M. Liao, Higher-order nonlinear vibration analysis of Timoshenko beams by the spline-based differential quadrature method, Journal of shock and vibration, 14(6) (2007) 407–416.

    Google Scholar 

  10. C. Chen, DQEM analysis of out-of-plane vibration of nonprismatic curved beam structures considering the effect of shear deformation, Advances in Engineering Software, 39 (2008) 466–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Liao and H. Zhong, Nonlinear vibration analysis of tapered Timoshenko beams, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 36 (2008) 1267–1272.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. M. A. Foda, Influence of shear deformation and rotary inertia on nonlinear free vibration of a beam with pinned ends, Computers and Structures, 71 (1999) 663–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Ramezani, A. Alasty and J. Akbari, Effects of Rotary Inertia and Shear Deformation on Nonlinear Free Vibration of Microbeams, Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, 128(5) (2006) 611–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. H. E. and J. H., A New Perturbation Technique Which is also Valid for Large Parameters, Journal of Sound and vibration, 229(5) (2000) 1257–1263.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. J. H. He, Homotopy perturbation method: a new nonlinear analytical technique, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 135 (2003) 73–79.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Belendez, A. Hernandez, T. Belendez, C. Neipp and A. Marquez, Application of the homotopy perturbation method to the nonlinear Pendulum, Eur. J. Phys., 28 (2007) 93–104.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Belendez, T. Belendez, A. Marquez and C. Neipp, Application of He’s homotopy perturbation method to conservative truly nonlinear oscillators, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 37(3) (2008) 770–780.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. J. H. He, Modified Lindstedt-Poincare methods for some strongly non-linear oscillations, Part I: expansion of a constant, International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 37 (2002) 309–314.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. J. H. He, Modified Lindstedt-Poincare methods for some strongly non-linear oscillations, Part II: a new transformation, International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 37 (2002) 315–320.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Taghi Ahmadian.

Additional information

This paper was recommended for publication in revised form by Associate Editor Eung-Soo Shin

Hamid Moeenfard receives the M.Sc degree in mechanical engineering from Sharif university of technology, Tehran, Iran, 2008. He is currently working toward PhD degree in mechanical engineering at Sharif university of technology. His main interests are nonlinear vibration, N/MEMS and MOEMS, perturbation theory, Kantorovich method and fuzzy logic and control. His researches are mainly about modeling and analysis of static and dynamic pull-in in electrostatically actuated microbeams/plates using analytical models. His current research is the mechanical modeling of nonlinear vibration and static and dynamic pull-in of electrostatically actuated tosional micromirrors considering squeeze film damping and nonlinear electrical and mechanical nonlinearities.

Mahdi Mojahedi is currently PhD candidate in School of Mechanical Engineering at the Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran. He has done his master of science in static instability and nonlinear vibrations of electrostatically actuated microbeams from the Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran in 2009. His M.Sc. Work has been published in the refereed journals and conference proceedings. His research interests are static, dynamic and nonlinear vibration of micro/nano electromechanical systems.

Mohammad Taghi Ahmadian received his B.S. & M.S. degree in physics 1972 from Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran and completed the requirements for B.S. & M.S. degree in mechanical Engineering in 1980 from university of Kansas in Lawrence. He received his PhD in Physics and PhD in Mechanical Engineering in 1981 and 1986 respectively from the same University. His research interests are Micro and Nano mechanics as well as bioengineering. He is currently a professor in the school of mechanical engineering and director of bioengineering research center at Sharif University of technology, Tehran, Iran.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moeenfard, H., Mojahedi, M. & Ahmadian, M.T. A homotopy perturbation analysis of nonlinear free vibration of Timoshenko microbeams. J Mech Sci Technol 25, 557–565 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-011-0130-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-011-0130-8

Keywords

Navigation